Is there another major operational and technological change that you see as part of the solution and that was not discussed today ?
No
2
49
Réduction of control centres (initial objective if SES in early 2000s)
1
15 years seem have to be lost, looking at the initial kick-off of SESAR.
Nothing new in the proposed elements.
A very disappointing exercise.
1
What could be the new Fabs supporting the new architecture service based oriented
1
Even being in agreement with discussed ops and tech changes, I suspect these may need different than todays EU political environment to succeed.
1
Drones because even toxay they are flying below : what about in 2035 sure they will fly above
1
Autonomous ATC
1
Self separation of aircraft.
Application of increase automation based on AI.
Managing the social impact.
Definition of a proper transition.
1
Autononomous operations
1
English language as the only language in european ATM (ATCOs, pilots, documentation), as an enabler for ATCOs mobility, virtual centres, flight centric operations etc.
Legislation needed for airspace delegations (virtual ATC, TBO, sectorless concept) = liability issues, charging scheme, cost and revenue sharing, single unit rate?
1
Migration to full IP data link
1
Predictability enhancements
Support to planning - accurate planning DCB
1
using the results of ongoing and planned UTM developments
1
Change from control to manage air traffic
Apply holistic and service centred approach
1
Service oriented Approach and not driven by technology
1
The need of changing mind set. We must move away from Air Traffic Control to Air Traffic Management. The interaction between air and ground and vice-versa needs to be improved.
1
Technology from other industries (eg. telecom, financial)
new entrants of the sky
UTM
1
Governance of network decisions
1
I aam eagerly awaiting a standard for high speed air ground data link. ! For me it is a crucial but missing part of the system.
With how many people and at what level are you working with ICAO on this pls?
1
Automation and digitalisation as overarching streams over the several presented solutions & changes needed
1
We would appreciate a more elaborate questionnaire and more time to enable us to give a company reply, this is just my opinion
1
Accelerate the deployment of a/g datalink, cpdlc, ads-c
Machine learning, artificial inteligence
1
Political will
1
There needs to be a rethink about airspace classification and the use of technology which could reduce controller work load whilst providing maximum effiecient use of the airspace. KNOWN AND KNOWN INTENT OF AIRCRAFT TRAJECTORIES
1
Political support to implement
1
Collaborative decision Making facilitation
1
Not necessarily technology but the political, social and business aspects need serious consideration.
1
Fully automated flights
1
The entire network consists also of the airline operation center decision and information capability. In my view this is not yet fully addressed. Also the entire MIL issue is not addressed as it should.
1
It is not about the technology it is about the soft-facts of political will and a sustainable and mutually agreed Conops and related investment plans
1
Military impact
1
Airspace architecture and cross border
1
actual implementation of the FAB concept
1
Political will and financial provisions
1
Please consider the actual root causes why we are still talking about the same issues than decades ago, it is not about concepts and engineering. It is about political responsibility and willingness for industrial leadership of all stakeholders
1
availability of MET forecast tailored for ATM need (weather is one of the major delay causes, and capacity is impacted by weather phenomena)
-what are we gonna do between now and 2030 when sesar solutions are available
1
Better predictability of Flight Plans in an open and less restrictiveenvironment from the beginning of flight planning! E.g. filing of 360-degree circles in cruising phase within a 10 NM circle in the Free Route Environment is lowering capacity as it puts unnecessary extra workload on ATCOs and disables modern conflict detection support systems on ANSPs side.
Is there another major operational and technological change that you see as part of the solution and that was not discussed today ?